Legal Opinion

Dannefer v. Aurand

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1920No. 22,604PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court; Charles L. Kagey, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action to recover for the alleged conversion of a crop of wheat, in which judgment was given for defendants, and from which plaintiffs appeal.

A tract of land was sold by W. B. Angle to Henry Aurand in October, 1917, through the agency of the plaintiffs, Dannefer and Stofer. . The tract was then occupied by a tenant, who had already planted a crop of wheat, and in the contract of sale a stipulation was included permitting the grantee to settle with the tenant for the growing wheat, and if he did so, a deduction from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Winchell v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. O'Neill v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Dorsey v. WellmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Garanflo v. CooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Kester v. AmonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Scott v. National Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Soeken v. HartwigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Beeler v. SimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API