Legal Opinion

Soeken v. Hartwig

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1927No. 27,641PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion, of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action by the purchaser of land to recover from the vendor thereof the value of the wheat crop grown on. ninety-five acres of the land purchased, which was growing and immature at the time of the purchase. No reservation of the crop was-made in the written contract or deed, but the vendor claims to have made an oral reservation thereof prior to the execution of the contract and deed. The answer alleged such oral reservation, and on the trial the court admitted evidence as to it. The jury found for the defendant, and specially…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. C. C. Isely Lumber Co. v. KitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Polley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Dannefer v. AurandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Myers v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NooneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Jones v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Blattler v. WestermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Hayhurst v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Hayhurst v. SaileSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API