Scott v. National Reserve Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
In the. original opinion in this case only the first and third of the principal assignments of error argued by the appellant were considered, and no comment or decision was made as to the second assignment of error, perhaps because it was thought to have been eliminated by the holding that it was error not to have granted a new trial. Yet it can be more forcibly said that the error, if any, in not granting defendant a new trial would be eliminated if there was error in not sustaining the motion of defendant on which ruling the second…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scott v. National Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Dannefer v. AurandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Smith v. Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Sentney v. Central Cattle Loan Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
3Cited by13 opinions
- National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- American Special Risk Management Corp. v. CahowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Chism v. Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- George v. Guarantee Mutual Life Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.