Legal Opinion

Myers v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1920No. 9750PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action in replevin by S. N. Myers against Harry Hubbard and another for the recovery of a certain crop of wheat. Judgment for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action in replevin filed in the district court of Alfalfa county, Oklahoma, on the 30th day of July, 1917, by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, as defendants below, to recover a crop of wheat then in stack on lands occupied by defendant Bonham. Plaintiff obtained the wheat under the writ. There was no redelivery bond. Trial was had to a jury and verdict was rendered for the defendants and a judgment was entered thereon for return of wheat or its value and damages for depreciation. Defendant Bonham also recovered exemplary damages. Erom this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Farmers State Bank of Newkirk v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Cook v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Garrison v. BonhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Beck v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API