Legal Opinion

Garanflo v. Cooley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Osborne District Court. The opinion states the case. At the February Term, 1884, the defendant Cooley recovered a judgment against plaintiff Garanflo, who brings it here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, J:

This action was brought in the district court of Osborne county by Frederick Garanflo as plaintiff, to enjoin Orrin Cooley, the defendant, from cutting, harvesting, or in any manner interfering with a growing crop upon a tract of land before that time conveyed by the plaintiff to the defendant. After issue was first joined between the parties and the trial had been commenced, objection was made by the defendant to the introduction of certain testimony offered by the plaintiff. The objection- being sustained, the plaintiff asked and obtained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. VeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Clay Centre v. BeegleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Polley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Dannefer v. AurandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Cooper v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API