Legal Opinion

Wachtstetter v. Challinor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1926No. 16345PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, conveyed by warranty deed a tract of land consisting of 170 acres, located in the state of Missouri, to defendant in error, who was defendant below, in exchange for a farm in Payne county, Okla., belonging to, .defendant in error. Defendant had not seen the Missouri land and apparently relied upon plaintiff’s description of it, and after the deeds were exchanged defendant claims to have learned that plaintiff had misrepresented the character of the land, the kind, character, and value of the improvements, its location, etc., and demanded a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Howerton v. Joplin Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Adrean v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Inter-State Refining & Producing Co. v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. M.-K.-T. R. Co. v. EmbreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Holmes v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Stafford v. McDougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Parrish v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API