Legal Opinion
Howerton v. Joplin Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 23, 1924No. 13944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DICKSON, C.
The parties will he referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant as they were designated in the trial court.
The plaintiff sued upon a verified account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered. The defendant answered: (1) By general denial. (2) Specifically denied the correctness of the account sued upon. (3) Denied that he ever contracted for the' purchase, or agreed, to pay for the items set out in the account sued for. This answer was verified. The. case was tried to'a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Motion for a new…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McFadyen and Brown v. MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Smith v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. CottonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Wicker v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Wachtstetter v. ChallinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Ward Way, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hawkins v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Troup v. HineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926