Davis v. Schott

PRITCHARD, Presiding Judge.

This is a suit upon an open account wherein respondents recovered judgment for $576.23 and for costs.

Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by reason of appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 84.04, V.A.M. R., in the preparation of his brief. One part of the motion attacks the sufficiency of the points relied upon by appellant, which are these:

“I.

The trial court erroneously permitted the respondents to introduce into evidence a self-serving letter.

II

The trial court erroneously based its judgment on issues not made by the pleadings.

III

There is no…