Legal Opinion

Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1976No. 9622PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Defendant compounded cattle feed which plaintiffs bought and fed to their bovines. Thereafter plaintiffs claimed that the feed contained an excessive amount of lead which caused death and sickness to their animals. A jury resolved the issues by awarding plaintiffs damages in the sum of $15,000.

The first point relied on by defendant is: “The trial court, erred in permitting the plaintiffs to read certain portions of the deposition of witness Edward E. Pickett into evidence over defendant’s objections, in that the admission of such evidence had no probative force and was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. DeArmon v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Holt v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Adams v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Nibler v. ColtraneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Tripp v. HarrymanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Weisenburger v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In Re Estate of KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. City of Kennett v. AkersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API