Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1979No. 10855PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Marcella R. Mayfield brought this action against defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for the “double indemnity benefit” contained in an insurance policy issued by defendant on the life of Loomis Mayfield. Plaintiff, the beneficiary named in the policy, is the widow of the insured. The cause was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s first “point relied on” reads: “The verdict and judgment were contrary to and against the weight of the evidence and contrary to the law under the evidence.” This…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. CoonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Ætna Life Ins. v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Neavill Ex Rel. Neavill v. KlempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Gennari v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Senkier v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. McClelland v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Walters v. MaloneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Pickard v. Transamerica Occidental Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API