Legal Opinion

Cissna v. Stout

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1996No. S-7820PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

1. INTRODUCTION

Sharon Cissna petitioned this court for a recount of the primary election vote for the Democratic Party nomination for State Representative for Election District 21. The Director of the Division of Elections (Director) certified that Ann Spohnholz, Cissna’s opponent, won the primary election by one vote. We affirm the decision of the Director. 1

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This is a recount appeal brought pursuant to AS 15.20.510(2). 2 A recount appeal is a direct review by this court of the recount decision. 3 Cissna seeks a recount of four votes cast…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arco Alaska, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Carr v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fischer v. StoutAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Carney v. State, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Alaska Center for the Environment v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. SuzukiAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API