Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carney v. State, Board of Fisheries

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1990No. S-2022PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINO WITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. COMPTON, Justice.

Homer Carney and other commercial set netters (set netters) in the Nushagak district of Bristol Bay challenge regulations established by the Board of Fisheries (the Board). The challenged regulations limit the distance from shore the set netters may fish. The set netters allege that these regulations are invalid (1) because of conflicts of interest on the Board, four of the seven voting members of the Board having an interest in drift net fishing in Bristol Bay, and (2) because the regulations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Alaska Survival v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lagos v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API