Arco Alaska, Inc. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
In this case, we consider whether article II, section 18 of the Alaska Constitution mandates a two-thirds vote of both houses of the legislature for the passage of a tax statute containing a retroactive provision. 1 We hold that it does not.
The facts in this case are uncontested. Appellants, 2 as producers of oil in Alaska, are subject to oil production taxes under AS 43.55.011-.013. An oil producer’s tax liability is calculated by multiplying an amount defined in AS 43.55.011 by the economic limit factor (ELF) as determined by a complex formula set out in AS 43.55.013. 3
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. A.L.I.V.E. VoluntaryAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Sonneman v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Anchorage Municipal Employees Ass'n v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Norton v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Myers v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Wright v. BlackAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.