Legal Opinion

Arco Alaska, Inc. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1992No. S-4155PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether article II, section 18 of the Alaska Constitution mandates a two-thirds vote of both houses of the legislature for the passage of a tax statute containing a retroactive provision. 1 We hold that it does not.

The facts in this case are uncontested. Appellants, 2 as producers of oil in Alaska, are subject to oil production taxes under AS 43.55.011-.013. An oil producer’s tax liability is calculated by multiplying an amount defined in AS 43.55.011 by the economic limit factor (ELF) as determined by a complex formula set out in AS 43.55.013. 3

In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. A.L.I.V.E. VoluntaryAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sonneman v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Anchorage Municipal Employees Ass'n v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Norton v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Myers v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wright v. BlackAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API