Watford v. . Pierce
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
This Court has stated and repeatedly approved the rule that when parties with a view to making a deed go upon the land, survey it, and actually run and mark the boundaries and thereupon execute and deliver the deed, intending to convey the land they have surveyed, the title to the surveyed land will pass to the grantee although the description in the deed may be erroneous. The ruling is aptly exemplified in the leading case of Person v. Roundtree, 2 N. C., 378. Roundtree entered a tract of land and ran it out as follows: “Beginning at a tree on the bank of Shocco Creek, running south .poles…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
- Baxter v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Cox v. . McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Barker v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Elliott v. Jefferson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Bryson v. . McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Bryson v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Central Bank & Trust Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.