Bryson v. McCoy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsON, J.
The court below instructed the jury that if they believed the evidence to be true as testified to by the witnesses to answer the first issue No and the second issue No. In this we think there was error. The instruction should have been the reverse. The main question in the case, and the only one necessary for the determination is the question as to whether the land was listed properly and definitely described.
This action presents a basic, fundamental principle. Article XIV, part sec. 1, Const, of U. S., is as follows: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Warren v. . WillifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Price v. SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Eames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Deans v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- M. E. Gruber, Inc. v. EubankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. Emig Properties Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943
- Cooper v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.