Cox v. . McGowan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ACTION, for the recovery of land, tried before Bynum, J., at April Term, 1891, of Pitt Superior Court. There was judgment’ for the defendant, and plaintiff appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Aveey.
1Opinion of the Court
Aveey, J.:
The plaintiff, Sarah Cox, claims through a purchaser at a foreclosure sale under a mortgage deed executed by the defendant, J". B. McGowan, to one W. H. Cox, wherein the land conveyed is described as “a certain tract of land in the county of Pitt, bounded on the north by the land of S. E. Worthington, on the east by the lands of T. A. McGowan and on the south and west by the lands of Iienry Carey, being the part of the Burton McGowan land conveyed by him to James H. McGowan, and containing eighty-seven acres, more or less.” The action is brought for possession and the land declared…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Baxter v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Shaffer v. . HahnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Carter v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Buckner v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gordon v. . EhringhausSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Sheets v. . WalshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- City of New Orleans v. Joseph Rathborne Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Clarke v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.