Bachovchin v. Stingley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In an appeal from the denial of posttrial motions for taxable costs, disbursements, attorney’s fees, and statutory penalties, we affirm the district court’s holding that actual damages are a necessary predicate to penalties and remedies provided in Minn. Stat. § 325E.16 (1992).
FACTS
This is a dispute over court costs and statutory penalties in litigation arising from Roger Stingley’s sale of a car to John Bachovchin of Pike Lake Motors. Ba-chovchin alleged that Stingley misrepresented the car’s mileage as 55,922 rather than disclosing the actual figure of 155,922 miles.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Matter of Will of GershcowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Love v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Kusniryk v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Posey v. FossenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Dennis I. Spencer Contractor, Inc. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Dennis I. Spencer Contractor, Inc. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994