Legal Opinion
Love v. Amsler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 1989No. C4-88-2240PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The owner of leased housing appeals a trial court judgment permitting a tenant’s recovery of rent payments for breach of the covenants of habitability and applying Minnesota’s Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act to deceptive landlord practices.
FACTS
The facts, as found by the trial court, are not disputed on appeal. In September 1986 Marsha Love and her three minor children rented a house from Boyd Amsler, Sr., agreeing to pay $385 per month and to be responsible for all utilities. Amsler required that water service for the property remain in his name and requested payment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- 49 Prospect Street v. Sheva Gardens, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bisson v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Switzer v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Bachovchin v. StingleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.