Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLINS, Judge. *
In these consolidated appeals from the district court’s denial of posttrial motions and judgment, National Beverage Corp. argues that (a) the determination that it was a party to the 1972 franchise agreement is erroneous as a matter of law; (b) the evidence regarding the contract claim was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury’s findings; and (c) the evidence regarding the defamation claim was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury’s findings. The Twin City Home Juice Co. parties argue that the district court erred as a matter of law in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008