Legal Opinion

Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 3, 2007No. A06-396, A06-397PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge. *

In these consolidated appeals from the district court’s denial of posttrial motions and judgment, National Beverage Corp. argues that (a) the determination that it was a party to the 1972 franchise agreement is erroneous as a matter of law; (b) the evidence regarding the contract claim was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury’s findings; and (c) the evidence regarding the defamation claim was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury’s findings. The Twin City Home Juice Co. parties argue that the district court erred as a matter of law in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API