Union Bank Co. v. Brumbaugh

This case presents two issues for our determination. The first is whether the trial court erred when it corrected “nunc pro tunc” its journal entry granting the bank 9.5 percent interest so that interest at 11.5 percent would begin to run from February 3, 1979. The second issue is whether appellant was entitled to an oral hearing prior to the trial court’s confirmation of the sale.

I

The note executed by appellant provided for interest at 9.5 percent per annum unless the bank, with 30 days prior written *205notice, decided to raise the interest. There is no indication in the record that the bank…