Legal Opinion

Women's Federal Savings Bank v. Pappadakes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1988No. 87-724PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The case subjudice, in light of the determination of the court below, requires that we consider whether the bond filed with the trial court suffices under R.C. 2329.332 as “the amount of the judgment or decree.” For the reasons set forth hereinafter, we hold that it does not and thus reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Initially, we note that a standing issue was raised by appellees at oral argument. It was appellees’ view, which they also asserted at the court of appeals, that since R.C. 2329.33 contemplates that nothing would be payable to appellant herein as a purchaser until it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Bank Co. v. BrumbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ohio Savings Bank v. AmbroseOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hausman v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bates v. Postulate Investments, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API