Ohio Savings Bank v. Ambrose
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether purchasers at a foreclosure sale have a vested interest in property prior to confirmation of the sale by the trial court, so as to establish standing in order to appeal a denial of confirmation.
Appellants argue that as purchasers at a judicial sale, they have the right to judicial review from the denial of confirmation. In support, appellants cite early case law which indicates that purchasers at foreclosure sales do have some type - of interest in the proceedings prior to confirmation.2 The often-cited case for this proposition, to which appellants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Love v. TupmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Women's Federal Savings Bank v. PappadakesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Michigan Mortgage Corp. v. OakleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Union Bank Co. v. BrumbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Farmers State Bank v. Sponaugle (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Guernsey Bank v. Milano Sports Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.