Legal Opinion

North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 22, 1975No. 73-1121PublishedCited by 790 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Under the statutes of the State of Georgia, plaintiffs in pending suits are “entitled to the process of garnish*602ment.” Ga. Code Ann. § 46-101.1 To employ the process, plaintiff or his attorney must make an affidavit before “some officer authorized to issue an attachment, or the clerk of any court of record in which the said garnishment is being filed fir in which the main case is filed, stating the amount claimed to be due in such action . . . and that he has reason to apprehend the loss of the same *603or some part thereof unless process of garnishment shall issue.” § 46-102. To protect defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. Jackson v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by790 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

785 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API