Legal Opinion
Enid City Ry. Co. v. City of Enid
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 24, 1914No. 2990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by the City of Enid against the Enid City Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.
This cause was tried upon the following agreed statement of facts:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed between the parties hereto that the city of Enid is a city of the first class under the laws of the then territory, now state of Oklahoma; that the defendant, the Enid City Railway Company, was incorporated under the laws of the then territory of Oklahoma on the-day of February, 1907, and that articles of incorporation were filed and a charter issued by the proper authorities of the then territory of Oklahoma, under and by virtue of article 4 of chapter 9 of Session Laws of 1903, and that on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- McGrath v. RoremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Whitten v. KroegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Powell v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.