Legal Opinion

Whitten v. Kroeger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1938No. 27746PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action by a subsequent indorser of a promissory note against the maker and payee thereof to recover judgment for money paid out to the holder of the note in partial satisfaction of the obligation. Judgment was against the subsequent indorser, and he has appealed. The respective parties are herein referred to as plaintiff and defendants, or by name.

The defendant H. A. Kroeger executed to the defendant J. C. (Jack) Walton a promissory note for the principal sum of $1,200, maturing July 1, 1930; for a valuable consideration, Waltoin indorsed the note to plaintiff Whitten; Whitten,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Capps v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McGrath v. RoremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Goodwin v. KraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Enid City Ry. Co. v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rist v. Westhoma Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Landy v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. HART INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Keyes v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Odom v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API