Legal Opinion
McGrath v. Rorem
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1926No. 16593PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
This action was commenced October 30, 1923, in the district court of Oklahoma county, by the plaintiff, S. D. Rorem, filing his petition against M. McGrath, claiming ownership and right to possession of lot 6 in block 8 of Townsend addition to the city of Edmond, by virtue of a’ quitclaim deed dated October 27, 1923. I-Ie alleged that defendant had taken possession of said lot without right or authority, and refused to give possession to plaintiff; that defendant claimed some interest, the nature o'f which was unknown to him, but whatever the interest, it was inferior…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Aultman & Taylor MacHinery Co. v. FussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Treese v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Jones v. ToomeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Patteson v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Wilson v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Reeves v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.