Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1948No. 3538PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

In April 1946, the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, by appropriate resolution, declared' its 5th street to be an arterial highway and directed the City Engineer to notify the-Midland Valley Railroad Company to restore the crossing at 5th street to the condition existing prior to the time it was closed in 1928 by an order of the State-Corporation Commission. When the Railroad Company refused and the City sent its employees upon the right of way to open the crossing, the Railroad Company brought this action, pursuant to which the trial court permanently enjoined the City *253and its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Frost v. WenieSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. BurroughsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. RollnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Holyoke Street Railway Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Friends of the Earth v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API