Legal Opinion

Schiele v. Schiele

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2015No. 20140371PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bradley Schiele appeals from the amended divorce judgment. We conclude the district court did not err in ordering Bradley Schiele to pay child support and did not err in failing to' offset the child support obligation based on the benefits the child receives. We affirm the second amended judgment.

I

[¶ 2] The parties married in 1992 and divorced in 2012.' Under the divorce judgment, the parties were awarded joint decision making foi their two minor children, and Brenda Schiele was awarded primary residential responsibility. At the time the divorce judgment was entered,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Boumont v. BoumontNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Crandall v. CrandallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Norberg v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allery v. WhitebullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Anderson v. Foss, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Estate of LindvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Allery v. WhitebullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Interest of F.M.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API