Legal Opinion

Berge v. Berge

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 20050124PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Meryem M. Berge appealed from an amended judgment setting Mark A. Berge’s child support obligation at $572 per month. We conclude the trial court erred as a matter of law in calculating Mark Berge’s child support obligation, and we reverse and remand for recalculation of his net income accompanied by an explanation of how the court determined the amount.

I

[¶ 2] • The parties married in 1981 and divorced in 1999. During the marriage, Mark Berge farmed near Litchville. At the time of the divorce, the trial court adopted the parties’ stipulation and property settlement…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Heley v. HeleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Spilovoy v. SpilovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. GonzalezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Halberg v. HalbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Entzie v. EntzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API