Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Zerr

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1991No. Civ. 910012PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Tom Peterson appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his claims against Kurt Zerr and awarding actual costs and attorney’s fees based upon the frivolous nature of Peterson’s claims against Zerr, and from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict dismissing Peterson’s claims against Interstate Investments [Interstate]. Interstate cross-appeals from the judgment upon the jury verdict. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion.

Interstate, a partnership, owned an office complex in north Bismarck. In 1978, Golden West Travel,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State Bank of Kenmare v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dewey v. LetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. BTA Oil Producers v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Anderson v. Meyer Broadcasting Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Iglehart v. IglehartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API