Legal Opinion
Boumont v. Boumont
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 2005No. 20040213PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Gregory Boumont appealed from an amended judgment, containing amended findings of fact and amended conclusions of law, in which his child support obligation for his two minor children was increased. Gregory Boumont claims the district court misapplied the Child Support Guidelines in determining his payment obligation. We agree and we reverse the district court’s amended judgment and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
[¶ 2] Gregory Boumont and Sarah Boumont entered into a Marital Termination Agreement. This agreement, which the district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Logan v. BushNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Jorgenson v. RatajczakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Knoll v. KuleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- S.J.F. v. R.C.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- North Dakota Department of Human Services v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Leno v. K & L Homes, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- GO Committee Ex Rel. Hale v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Serr v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Ehli v. JoyceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.