Legal Opinion
Interest of F.M.G.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 2017No. 20170136PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McEvers, Justice.
[¶ 1] F.M.G. appeals the district court’s order authorizing involuntary treatment with prescribed medication. F.M.G. argues the district court erred in granting the request to treat her with prescribed medications, because the proper medical providers did not testify at the hearing under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-18.1(1)(a), and the mandatory certification requirements under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-18.1(1)(a)(2) were not met. We conclude N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-18.1(1)(a) does, not require both treating and non-treating physicians to testify at the hearing, and F.M.G. did not adequately raise…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shark v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Knoff v. American Crystal Sugar Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- In Interest of NyflotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Interest of F.M.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017