Matter of Zany
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for discharge upon a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
It appears from the petition that petitioner, Charles Zany, is imprisoned by the authority of a warrant of arrest issued on July 11, 1912, upon a complaint filed that day in the justice's court of Modesto township, county of Stanislaus. It is alleged in the petition that said complaint is invalid, illegal, and void in that it fails to charge a public offense and conferred no authority on the said justice of the peace to issue said warrant; "that said complaint is founded upon and charges a violation of the terms and provisions of an ordinance enacted by the people of the county of Stanislaus,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Matter of ZanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ex Parte BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Ex parte StephenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Matter of EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.