Matter of Zany
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION to the Supreme Court to transfer to it a proceeding in habeas corpus, after the decision therein of the District Court of Appeal of the Third District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The opinion of the District Court of Appeal discharging the petitioner is reported in 20 Cal. App. 360, [129 Pac. 295],
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
An order denying the application for a hearing in this court, after decision by the district court of appeal for the third district discharging the petitioner from custody, was made by this court on January 13, 1913. We deem it proper to say that the order denying the application was made without regard to the merits of the decision of the district court of appeal, which we have not considered and as to which we express no opinion, and solely, upon the ground that this court has no such power of transfer in habeas corpus proceedings.
Such has been our ruling as to all such applications…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Santa Rosa City Railroad v. Central Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Frankel v. DeidesheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- France v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.