Legal Opinion
Cargill, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 2002No. C1-01-1589PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORIS OHLSEN HUSPENI, Judge. *
Appellant insured seeks reversal of summary judgment awarded to respondent insurer, and argues that the district court erred in determining that (1) a claim was not made by appellant according to the terms of the insurance policy, (2) notice of the claim was not properly given to respondent by appellant, (3) the other-insurance clause in the policy prevents appellant from qualifying for coverage, and (4) the owned-property exclusion in the policy prevents appellant from qualifying for coverage. Because the district court erred in its application of the law…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ritrama, Inc. v. HDI-Gerling America InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Donaldson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Unitedhealth Group Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Food Market Merchandising, Inc v. Scottsdale Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Food Market Merchandising, Inc. v. Scottsdale Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.