State v. . Spain
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stact, C. J.,
after stating tbe case: Tbe announcement of tbe solicitor tbat tbe State would not ask for a verdict of more than burglary in tbe second degree, was tantamount to taking a nolle prosequi with leave on tbe capital charge. S. v. Hunt, 128 N. C., 584, 38 S. E., 473.
It is established by tbe record tbat tbe dwelling-house in question was actually occupied at tbe time of tbe alleged offense. This precluded tbe court from submitting tbe case to tbe jury on tbe charge of burglary in tbe second degree as defined by C. S., 4232. S. v. Smith, ante, 494; S. v. Ratcliff, 199 N. C., 9, 153 S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- State v. . FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . RatcliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. HickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . BentleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.