State v. . Gregory
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStaoy, C. J.
The announcement of the solicitor, made before entering upon the trial, that the State would not ask for a verdict of more than murder in the second degree, was tantamount to taking a nolle prosequi, or accepting an acquittal, on the capital charge. S. v. Brigman, 201 N. C., 793, 161 S. E., 727; S. v. Spain, ibid., 571, 160 S. E., 825; S. v. Hunt, 128 N. C., 584, 38 S. E., 473.
The dying declaration of the deceased was admitted only after proper foundation or predicate had been laid for its introduction. S. v. Beal, 199 N. C., 278, 154 S. E., 604.
The only serious exception appearing on the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.