Legal Opinion

State v. McNeely

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1956No. 221PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winborne, G. J.

The record of the case on appeal here presented discloses assignments of error substantially as follows:

Numbers 1 and 2 are directed to exceptions to two portions of the charge given to the jury. It is noted, however, that in brief filed in this Court neither of the exceptions to the designated portions of the charge is set out by appellant, nor is reason or argument stated or authority cited in support of them. Hence the assignments of error are taken as abandoned by appellant. Rule 28 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at 562. Nevertheless, reading the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API