Legal Opinion

State v. . Morris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1939PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

To seek to injure another or to take advantage of him while he is disarmed by sleep is to evince a heart devoid of social duties and a mind fatally bent on mischief. Such is the stuff of which house-thieves are made. Hence, burglary was regarded at the common law as one of the worst of crimes. 9 Am. Jur., 239. In its highest degree, it is still a capital offense in North Carolina. The purpose of the law was and is to protect the habitation of men, where they repose and sleep, from meditated harm. “A burglar (or the person that committeth burglary),” says Lord Coke, 3 Inst., 63,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. . FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . RatcliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API