Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Cockrell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1910No. 1600PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Oñgvnal Action for Writ of Mandamus. Action by the State, upon the relation of Charles A? Taylor, State Examiner and Inspector, against E. B. Cockrell, State Bank Commissioner.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an original action for a writ of mandamus, instituted by the state of Oklahoma upon the relation of Charles A. Taylor, State Examiner and Inspector, against A. M. Young, Bank Commissioner of the state of Oklahoma. After the petition was filed Mr. Young resigned as Bank Commissioner and Mr. C'oekrell, who was appointed to fill his place, appeared and prayed that he might be substituted as party defendant in place of said A. M. Young, and, upon being made a party, he adopted the answer filed by Mr. Young and made the same his answer.

The office of State Examiner and Inspector exists in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Ozan Lumber Co. v. BiddieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Rakowski v. Wagoner, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Lafalier v. LEAD-IMPACTED COMMUNITIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Wirtz v. NestosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API