Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Rockland Lake Trap Rock Co. v. Conkling
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 19, 1905No. 102PublishedCited by 8 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of .the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.
In May, 1899, defendant John R Conkling entered into a contract with the United States to purchase and remove the stone owned by the United States, stored on the south side *509of the cut through Dyckman’s Meadows, near Spuyten Duyvil and the Harlem river. The contract provided as follows:
“The contractor for the removal of the stone must furnish all appliances and labor necessary to handle and transport it, and must dispose of it in accordance with law. All debris or material which may be mixed with the rock must also be removed. * * *
“The stone will be measured by cubic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- United States ex rel. Thomas Laughlin Co. v. MorganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1900
- United States ex rel. Sica v. KimplandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1899
- United States ex rel. Sabine & E. T. Ry. Co. v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Southern Surety Co. v. Municipal Excavator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- United States ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. D. L. Taylor Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1920
- Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. R. S. Armstrong & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Shunk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.