Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. R. S. Armstrong & Bro.

The suit was grounded on a construction contract bond of like import to that considered by this court in Union Indemnity Co. v. McQueen-Smith Farming Co. (Ala. Sup.) 114 So. 415,1 and the insistences now made by appellant are in the nature of a rehearing as to that decision.

In that opinion there was recitation of the facts of that case — the contract terms of the guaranty for payment of sums due for labor, materials, and supplies used in the performance of the contract — held to embrace piling and sway braces used for scaffolding in the river to (1) support the men at work and the materials…