Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. D. L. Taylor Co.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided October 25, 1920PublishedCited by 18 opinions

At Law. Action by the United States, to the use of the Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, against the D. L,. Taylor Company and the Fidelity & Deposit Company, in which the Delaware Dredging Company and another intervened.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

This action was brought by the United States of America for the use of the Norfolk Southern Railroad Company against the defendants D. U. Taylor & Co. and Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland for the recovery of $22,000, alleged to he due from D. L. Taylor & Co. Jury trial was waived, and stipulation filed that the court find the facts.

Plaintiff alleged that D. I ,. Taylor & Co. on March 2, 1915, entered into a contract with the United States whereby said company undertook to construct for the United States, in accordance with certain plans and specifications, a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  3. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. McCree & Company v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. In Re VolpiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API