Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Co. v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1961No. 35302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

— This case is before the court on the findings of fact, no error having been assigned thereto. They show that the action was brought by the United States Rubber Company to obtain the appointment of a receiver for Glen Young’s Sporthaus, a sporting-goods store in Yakima, Washington. The appellant, who held a chattel mortgage on the fixtures and the shifting stock of merchandise in that establishment, intervened, claiming a balance due of $8,943.17, plus interest, and asking foreclosure of the mortgage.

The stock of goods and fixtures were sold and the proceeds were held by the receiver,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Cascade Fixture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tahoma Finance Co. v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Griffiths v. CraneyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Simpson v. CombesWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wolfkill v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diamond National Corporation v. Dale Lee, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Robert A. Watson v. Wesley K. Duce, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Myrtle M. Dawson, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API