Legal Opinion

Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 1995No. 52PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Before us are cross-petitions in an action initiated under the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act (the Act), Maryland Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol., 1994 Cum.Supp.), §§ 3-2A-01 through 3-2A-09 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (CJ). The principal issue presented by the claimant’s petition concerns default procedures in arbitration when malpractice claims are asserted against multiple defendants. We shall hold that, where a common basis of liability had been alleged against two defendants, one of whom failed to answer, a finding in favor of the non-defaulting…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,552 International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Breslin v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Porter Hayden Co. v. BullingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Maryland Board of Physicians v. GeierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API