Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1975No. [No. 76, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

We are here asked to rule that a defendant in a criminal case whose sentence has been modified, pursuant to Maryland Rule 764 b 2, has the right, within 30 days from the imposition of that revised sentence, to appeal to the Court of Special Appeals.

The appellant, William Johnson, Jr., was charged in the District Court upon a warrant with having assaulted and shot one George Chestnut on September 24, 1973. Upon his arraignment in that court he elected trial by jury and his case was transferred to the Criminal Court of Baltimore. See Maryland Code (1974), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Corey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. William L. Poole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API