Legal Opinion

Landis v. AMERICAN POTASH & CHEMICAL CORPORATION

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1962No. 4451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

This appeal requires the construction of a collective bargaining agreement entered into by a labor union and the employer, with particular reference to the employer’s agreement to continue in effect certain group insurance, as well as the construction of the group insurance policy itself. Both parties agree that the collective bargaining agreement and the policy of group insurance must be considered and construed together.

All emphasis appearing in the opinion has been supplied by the court, as key words and key phrases, whether relied upon by the respective…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richard L. Elsey v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  2. Chrosniak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Harlan v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Degnan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Tedesco v. Turner Seymour Mfg. Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cudd v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Airport Casino, Inc. v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Philippi Motor Co. v. Investors InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Bingman v. New Milford Board of Education, No. Cv 91 0056899 (Mar. 7, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API