Legal Opinion

Degnan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

We are in agreement on the proposition that a strike did not terminate the relationship of employer and employee within the meaning of the provisions of the policy of group insurance. A strike may be defined as a cessation of work on the part of employees until more desirable terms of employment can be obtained. But a strike does not in and of itself operate to put an end to the employer-employee relationship. (Jeffery-DeWitt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 F. [2d] 134; National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 94 id. 138, 147; Iron Molders’ Union v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Potoker & Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Reger v. National Ass'n of Bedding Manufacturers Group Insurance Trust FundNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. DoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Van Ostrand v. National Life Assurance Co. of CanadaNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Landis v. AMERICAN POTASH & CHEMICAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API