Degnan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
We are in agreement on the proposition that a strike did not terminate the relationship of employer and employee within the meaning of the provisions of the policy of group insurance. A strike may be defined as a cessation of work on the part of employees until more desirable terms of employment can be obtained. But a strike does not in and of itself operate to put an end to the employer-employee relationship. (Jeffery-DeWitt Insulator Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 F. [2d] 134; National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 94 id. 138, 147; Iron Molders’ Union v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Potoker & Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Reger v. National Ass'n of Bedding Manufacturers Group Insurance Trust FundNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Allstate Insurance Company v. DoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Van Ostrand v. National Life Assurance Co. of CanadaNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Landis v. AMERICAN POTASH & CHEMICAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.