Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Turner Seymour Mfg. Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 30, 1954No. File No. 9418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is brought by the plaintiff against his employer, The Turner and Seymour Manufacturing Company, for payment to him of certain insurance benefits alleged to be due him under a collective bargaining contract. The plaintiff seeks also, in the alternative, similar, but not duplicate, payment from the defendant insurer, The Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as the insurance carrier.

The plaintiff is a member of the Torrington Foundry Workers Local No. 699, also known as No. 1699, Progressive Metalworkers Council, Congress of Industrial Organizations, which is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Magee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1894
  4. Degnan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Formisano v. Blue Cross of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. Landis v. AMERICAN POTASH & CHEMICAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Korzinek v. POSTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API