Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1973No. 72-696PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William B. Bb,own, J.
The court in this case is called upon to interpret a provision of an insurance policy to determine whether the decedent qualified for coverage under the contract and whether his mother, as sole beneficiary, can collect thereunder.
The relevant provision of the insurance policy is included in the Stipulation of Facts. It provides:
“4. Effective January 1,1968, General Motors Corporation and the Defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Com*140pany, entered into an Agreement amending and revising Group Policy No. 15500-G under which, employees of General Motors Corporation,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- American Financial Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Hartzell Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- Arizona Land Title & Trust Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Williams v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Borden, Inc. v. Affiliated FM InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Marginian v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Albrecht v. North American Life Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.